ၿခံႏွင္႕ အိမ္ကို အေမြခြဲေပးေစလိုမႈ ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးက ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ အေပၚစြဲဆိုမႈ စစ္ေဆး

ဗဟန္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္ တကၠသိုလ္ရိပ္ သာလမ္းရွိ ေနအိမ္ႏွင့္ ၿခံ၀င္းကို ျမန္မာ့ဓေလ့ထံုးတမ္းဥပေဒအရ အေမြပံုပစၥည္းအျဖစ္ စီမံခန္႔ခြဲေပး ရန္ တရားမေၾကာင္းအရ ဦးေအာင္ ဆန္းဦးကေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ အေပၚ ေလွ်ာက္ထားတရားစြဲဆို ခဲ့မႈကို ရန္ကုန္အေနာက္ပိုင္း ခ႐ိုင္တရား႐ံုးတြင္ ေဖေဖာ္၀ါရီလ ၁၀ ရက္ေန႔က ဆက္လက္စစ္ေဆး ၾကားနာခဲ့ေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။
ထိုသို႔ စစ္ေဆးရာတြင္ တရား ၿပိဳင္ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ဘက္မွ တင္ျပေသာတကၠသိုလ္လမ္းေန ဦးေအး၀င္း(ဦးဘ၀င္း၏သား) ကို ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္၏ ဥပေဒ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္က ေမးျမန္းစစ္ေဆး ခဲ့သည္။ ယင္းသို႔ ေမးျမန္းရာတြင္ မိခင္ႀကီးေဒၚခင္ၾကည္ကြယ္လြန္ၿပီး ေနာက္ ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးႏွင့္ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္တို႔ ႏွစ္ဦး သေဘာတူခ်ဳပ္ဆိုခဲ့ေသာ စာခ်ဳပ္ကို အဓိကထား၍ ေမးျမန္းသည္။တရား လိုဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦး၏ ဥပေဒ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္က ျပန္လွန္ေမးခြန္း မ်ားေမးျမန္းခဲ့သည္။ လြန္ခဲ့ေသာ ၂၀၁၀ ျပည့္ႏွစ္မွ စတင္၍ ဦးေအာင္ ဆန္းဦးက ဗဟန္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္တကၠသိုလ္ ရိပ္သာလမ္း အမွတ္ ၅၄/၅၆ ရွိ ေနအိမ္ႏွင့္ ၿခံ၀င္းကို အေမြပံုပစၥည္း ခြဲေ၀ေပးေစလိုမႈျဖင့္ ေဒၚေအာင္ ဆန္းစုၾကည္အေပၚတရား႐ံုးတြင္ ေလွ်ာက္ထားတရားစြဲဆိုခဲ့သည္။ ယင္းအမႈကို တရား႐ံုးကၾကားနာၿပီး ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးကို ႏိုင္ငံျခားသား တစ္ဦးအေနျဖင့္ ေနအိမ္ႏွင့္ ၿခံ၀င္း ကို ပိုင္ဆုိင္ခြင့္မရွိေၾကာင္း အမိန္႔ခ် မွတ္၍ အမႈ႐ႈံးနိမ့္ခဲ့သည္ဟု သိရ သည္။
ထို႔ေနာက္ ၂၀၀၁ ခုႏွစ္တြင္ ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦး၏ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ ေရွ႕ေနမ်ားက ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစု ၾကည္အေပၚ အေမြပံုပစၥည္းစီမံခန္႔  ခြဲေပးေစလိုမႈ ထပ္မံတရားစြဲဆိုခဲ့ရာ ၁၀ ႏွစ္ၾကာခဲ့သည္ဟု သိရသည္။ အမႈကို ေဖေဖာ္၀ါရီ ၂၄ ရက္တြင္ ဆက္လက္စစ္ေဆးၾကားနာေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။
နႏၵလင္း (ျမန္မာပုိ ့စ္ဂလုိဘယ္)
ၿခံႏွင္႕ အိမ္ကို အေမြခြဲေပးေစလိုမႈ ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးက ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ အေပၚစြဲဆိုမႈ စစ္ေဆး ၿခံႏွင္႕ အိမ္ကို အေမြခြဲေပးေစလိုမႈ ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးက ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ အေပၚစြဲဆိုမႈ စစ္ေဆး Reviewed by သစ္ထူးလြင္ on 06:17 Rating: 5

78 comments:

Toe Gyi said...

ေတာမီေလာင္ ေတာေၾကာင္ လက္ခေမာင္းခတ္ ဆုိတဲ့ စာသားကုိ ေတာမီးကုိ ေတာေၾကာင္ရိွဳ႕ ၿပီးမွ လက္ခေမာင္း ထခတ္တာျဖစ္ႏုိင္ပါတယ္၊ ေရွ႕ေနေတြအေၾကာင္းေတာ့ သိပ့္မသိ ပါဘူး၊ ၾကားဘူးတာတစ္ခုကေတာ့ တရားခံနဲ့ တရားလုိ ေရွ့ေန ႏွစ္ဦးဟာ တရားခြင္မွာဘယ္ ေလာက္ ရန္ျဖစ္ျဖစ္ တရားခြင္အျပင္မွာေတာ့ လက္တြဲမျဖဳတ္ဘူးလုိ့ ၾကားဘူးပါတယ္။

အျမင္သစ္ said...

ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးရဲ႕ ကေတာ္က အရင္ ေၾကာင္ပါးၾကီးေတြနဲ႔ အင္မတန္ ပဏၰာသင့္တယ္ၾကားဖူးတယ္။ ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးကေတာ့ ကေတာ္ၾကီးကို မလြန္ဆန္နိုင္တာနဲ႔ တရားစဲြ ရပံု ရပါတယ္တဲ့။ကေတာ္ၾကီးကေတာ့ ေၾကာင္ပါးၾကီးေတြဆီက ပါမစ္ေတြရေအာင္လို႔ ေၾကာင္ပါးၾကီးေတြကိုမ်က္ႏွာလို မ်က္ႏွာရ လုပ္ျပီး ေဒၚစုကိုတရားစဲြဖုိ႔ လင္ေတာ္ေမာင္ၾကီးကို စည္းရံုူးသတဲ့။လင္ေတာ္ေမာင္ၾကီးကလည္း ငဒူ ၾကီးဆိုေတာ့ ကေတာ္ၾကီးအလိုက် ေဒၚစုကိုတရားစြဲေပးရသတဲ့။ အဲလို ေၾကာင္ပါးၾကီးေတြကို မ်က္ႏွာလုပ္မွ ပါမစ္ေတြကလည္း ဒလေဟာ က်လာမွာေလ.....အင္း .... ေလာဘေလာဘ.......အခုေတာ့ စားေနက်ေၾကာင္ပါးၾကီးေတြက တစ္ျဖဲႏွစ္ျဖဲစားပီး နားကုန္ၿပီ... ေၾကာင္သူေတာ္ ၾကြက္သူခိုးေတြဘဲက်န္ေတာ့တယ္...

Unknown said...

Yes, it should be. They are just doing their profession in a professional manner and no need to be aggressive outside court. But during court hearings they are going to compete seriously (within the legal framework) and apparently like enemies, seemingly for the benefit of their client.If doctors mourn and feel too sorry for every patient they treated, they might not be able to treat future patient, but they do treat their patient with the best all their capacity. That's professionalism.

Cinderella said...

အ‌ေမစုကတိုင္းျပည္နဲ့လူမ်ိုးအတြက္‌ေန့မအားညမနားအရြယ္နဲ့မလိုက္‌ေအာင္
အပင္ပန္းချံကိုးစား‌ေနရွာတယ္..ဘာမွ‌ေသြးသားမ‌ေတာ္စပ္တျဲ့ပည္သူလူထု
ကအ‌ေမ့အတြက္စိုးရိမ္‌ေသာကနဲ့အ‌ေမ့ဘက္ကရပ္တည္အား‌ေပးျကတယ္.
ဒီအခ်ိန္မွာအစ္ကိုရင္း‌ေခါက္‌ေခါက္ျကီးကသားသမီးလဲမရွိပါဘဲမယားအမ်ိုး
‌ေတြအ‌ေမြဆက္ခံဖို့၊မယားအမ်ိုး‌ေတြဟိုတယ္ဖြင့္ဖို့အတြက္အရွက္မရျွိကိုးစား
‌ေနလိုက္တာ..ရာဇဝင္ရိုင္းလိုက္‌ေလဦးလဲ့လဲ့နြယ္ဦးရယ္..။

min yar zar said...

ဒီလူက တုိ့ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ရဲ့သားလို့ ေျပာရမွာေတာင္ရွက္ပါတယ္၊ တစ္ဖေအ၊ တစ္မေအ တည္းကေမြးလာျပီး အတူတကြ ၾကီးျပင္းလာခဲ့တဲ့ ဒီေလာက္ အဖိုးတန္တဲ့ ကိုယ့္ညီမကို ဘာလို့မ်ား အရွက္မရွိ အတင္းလာျပီး တရားစြဲေနရတာလဲ? ဖေအတူသားမျဖစ္ပဲ အခုမွ ဒီတိုင္းျပည္ေပၚက မိဘ အေမြကို လာလုေနရတာလဲ? နားကိုမလည္ဘူး၊

Anonymous said...

ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေရ..ကိုဦးဆိုတဲ႔ေကာင္က ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ထင္တားတာနဲ႔တလြဲ မယားေၾကာက္ႀကီးဗ် တိုင္းျပည္နဲ႔လူမ်ိဳးအတြက္ေတာ႔ေ၀းပါတယ္ အဖိုးေရ...

Min Kha said...

ေႀသာ္ သူလည္းတစ္ခန္းတစ္ေထာင့္ ကပါျပီးနံမည္ႀကီးခ်င္တာေပါ့......
ဆင္ျဖဴျမီျပီးႀကံဆုတ္တယ္ဆိုတာၾကားဘူးတယ္မဟုတ္လား........

nyw said...

why she can't give half? It is own by their parents. Why not she can't do fairly?

thethnin said...

သူ႔အစားရွက္လိုက္တာ

kiddykid said...

ႏိုင္ငံျခားသား တစ္ဦး (သူမ်ားႏိိိုင္ငံသား ခံယူသြားသည္ကုိဆိုလိုသည္) ဟာဘယ္လိုမွ အေမြဆက္ခံႏိုင္ခြင့္ လံုး၀ လံုး၀ကို မရိွပါ။

Myo Aung said...

လူေတြေျပာေနတဲ့ အမ်ိဳးသား သစၥာေဖါက္ဆိုတာ ဒီလိုလူမ်ိဳးကို ေျပာတာ။ ညီမအရင္းကိုေတာင္ ဒီေလာက္ျပႆနာရွာရင္ တျခားလူဆိုရင္ေတာ့။

ဒီလူၾကီး ဦးေႏွာက္မွေကာင္းရဲ့လား။ ေစာေစာေသသင့္တာက ေအာင္ဆန္းဦး။ ယမမင္းက လူေရြးမွားသြားတာ။ ေဒၚစုကို အဖြဲ့အစည္းအမ်ိဳးမ်ိဳးက ဘြဲေတြအမ်ိဳးမ်ိဳးေပးေနသလို ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးကိုလည္း ´ျပည္သူ့အန္ဖတ္´ ဘြဲ့ကို တခန္းတနားနဲ့ ေပးသင့္တယ္

အျမင္သစ္ said...

nyw ေရ ဒီအိမ္ၾကီးကဘယ္ေလာက္တန္မွာမလို႔လဲ...ေဒၚစုက သူရတဲ့ ဆုေၾကးေငြေတြကိုေတာင္မွ ေဒၚလာသန္းနဲ႔ခ်ီျပီး တိုင္းျပည္လူမႈေရးလုပ္ငန္းေတြအတြက္ အကုန္လႈပစ္တာ.....
ကိုယ့္ေမးခြန္းကို ကိုယ့္ဟာကိုျပန္စဥ္းစား ....ေငြမက္လို႔ေတာ့ မဟုတ္ဘူးဆို......

Mike said...

It's ashame for Daw Su Kyi not to give half of the property away to her brother who is entitled to 50% of the property.

Her brother may want to use the money (I think it will be about 10 million dollars) to enjoy life in the remaining years or even may decide to donate for a good cause.

For people who commented against her brother, I like to ask whether they will give away 10 million dollars to someone like that if they were her brother.

philosophermgmyathar said...

ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးအေနနဲ႔ကေတာ့ ငယ္ငယ္ကတဲက စရုိက္ကေတာ့ ရုိးရုိးေအး
ေအးပါ. စကားေတာင္မွအင္မတန္ကုိေမးနဳိင္မွ ျပန္ေျဖတဲ့ကေလးလုိ႔ေလ့လာ
သိရွိရပါတယ္..အခုဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးနံမည္နဲ႔ တရားစြဲတယ္ဆုိေတာ့ .ေသခ်ာ
ပါတယ္.ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးမိန္းမ လဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္သိန္း စနက္ ေတြပါ.အဲဒီလဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္
သိန္းက အေမရိကန္ေနထုိင္စဥ္ကနီဂရုိး တဦးနဲ႔လား ..အေမရိကန္တဦးနဲ႔
လားမသိပါ..အိမ္ေထာင္က်ခဲ့ဘူးတယ္လုိ႔ၾကားသိရပါတယ္.ဦးေအာင္ဆန္း
ဦးက တခုလပ္မလဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္သိန္းကုိ ေကာက္ယူတာပါ.သံအမတ္ေဟာင္း
တဦးရဲ့သမီးဆုိေတာ့ ေတာ္ေတာ္လည္တယ္လုိ႔ေျပာသံၾကားရပါတယ္.detail သိသူမ်ားေဖၚထုတ္ေပးၾကပါကုန္ ..

Acmv Org said...

"တရား႐ံုးကၾကားနာၿပီး ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးကို ႏိုင္ငံျခားသား တစ္ဦးအေနျဖင့္ ေနအိမ္ႏွင့္ ၿခံ၀င္း ကို ပိုင္ဆုိင္ခြင့္မရွိေၾကာင္း အမိန္႔ခ် မွတ္၍ အမႈ႐ႈံးနိမ့္ခဲ့သည္ဟု သိရ သည္။"

ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦး က ၿမန္မာနုိင္ငံမဟုတ္ဘူး။ သူဖခင္ အသက္ေပးခဲ့တဲ့ တုိင္းၿပည္ေတာင္စြန့္ခဲ့ေသးတာ ေၿမတကြက္ အိမ္တလံုး ႏွင့္ ဘာလုိ့ ေသခါနီးမွ အပယ္သြားခ်င္ရတာလဲ။ အကုသိုလ္စိတ္ေတြ ႏွင့္ ဘဝရဲ ့ေနာက္ဆံုးအခ်ိန္ကို အကုန္မခံခ်င္ႏွင့္ေလ...

ktd said...

သားဦး အရူးဆိုလား စကားပံုရွိတယ္။

Bravo said...

သူ႔ဇနီးနာမည္အရင္းက ေဒၚသိန္းလဲ့ႏြယ္ပါ။ Regional college ေပၚကာစက Zoo ဆရာမ ဝင္လုပ္ဖူးပါေသးတယ္။ ဇာတ္စံုသိခ်င္ရင္ အဲဒီသဲလြန္စနဲ႔ပဲ ေမးျမန္းၾကည့္ၾကပါ။

yin win said...

လွပ၊တန္ဖုိးၿဖတ္မရတဲ႔ သမုိင္းစာအုပ္တစ္အုပ္ၿဖစ္ခါနီး...ညစ္ႏြမ္းတဲ႔စာမ်က္ႏွာတခုကုိ ဘာလုိထဲခ်င္ရတာလဲ..ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦး ေရ...ခင္ဗ်ားဟာ ၿပည္သူခ်စ္၊ေလးစားတဲ့ ဗုိလ္ခ်ဳပ္သားပါ..မညံ့ပါဘူး...က်ေနာ္ဘုန္းၾကီးေက်ာင္းထြက္သာမွန္လယ္သမားတစ္ေယာက္ပါ ..ထင္ၿမင္ခ်က္မွားရင္ခြင့္လႊတ္ပါ..

မ်ိဳးခ်စ္ဗမာ said...

ေအာ္ ေအာင္ဆန္းဦး ေအာင္ဆန္းဦး ေတာ္ေတာ္မိုက္တဲ့ေကာင္ပဲ တစ္မေအထဲ ေမြးတာမွဟုတ္ပါေလစ အဲဒီအေမြရေတာ့မင္းက ဘယ္ေလာက္ခ်မ္းသာ သြားမွာလဲ အမ်ားၿပည္သူအတြက္ဘာတစ္ခုမွ မယ္မယ္ရရလုပ္မေပးပဲ တိုင္းၿပည္နဲ႕လူမ်ိဳးအတြက္ အသက္စြန္႕ေပးဆပ္သြားတဲ့ အဖိုးဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္း မ်က္နွာကိုမွ မေထာက္ ၿပည္သူလူထုအတြက္ အရာရာေပးဆပ္ စြန္႕လႊတ္အနစ္နာခံ ေနတဲ့ ၿပည္သူလူထုက ေလးစားအားကိုး ၿမတ္နိုဳးတန္ဘိုးထားေနတဲ့ အေမစုကိုမွ မနာလိုတဲ့သူေတြ ရွဴးတိုက္တိုင္းလိုက္ ေဟာင္ေနေတာ့မွာလား တေတာင္းစားရဲ႕။
အေမြဆိုတာ မေသမခ်င္းမွတ္ထား ထိုက္မွစံရတာ ကိုယ္ကၿဖင့္တိုင္းၿပည္နဲ႕လူမ်ိဳးအတြက္ ဘာတစ္ခုမွ မေပးဆပ္ဘူးပဲနဲ႕ သမိုင္းမွာအမဲစက္မထင္ခ်င္စမ္းပါနဲ႕ အသာေအးေအးေနစမ္းပါ ။
မကူညီခ်င္ေနပါ္ မေႏွာင့္ရွက္ခ်င္စမ္းပါနဲ႕ မင္းအတြက္နဲ႕ အဖိုး နဲ႕ အေမစုကို မ်က္ႏွာပူလြန္းလို႕ပါ ေဝးေဝးေနစမ္းပါ ။၊၊၊၊။။။၊၊၊။

Fighting Peacock said...

To NYW & Mike,
I found your comments as a half, 50%, 10 million dollars & to enjoy life.........to enjoy life, 10 million dollars, 50% & a half..........a half, 50%, 10 million dollars & to enjoy life................ to enjoy life, 10 million dollars, 50% & a half............That's all.
Ahhhh! So shameful on you................

I bet you must be Aung San Oo's wife herself (Ex-Lecturer), his lawyers or if not, definitely her relatives who expecting a half, 50% or 10 million dollars for free to enjoy life.
Do you ever think about the country, Daw Su's dedication to the country or suffering people from Myanmar? Aung San Oo can be entitled it as other citizen? Do you think everybody would think only money, money & money like you? Daw Su has already sold the house for her won profit? What do you think The National Hero, General Aung San would decide on such a request? General Aung San would shoot himself or you when he heard this request.
I first thought it was REGIME's monopoly when I heard such a demand a few years ago. Ohhhh! it was finally true request by Aung San Oo. Hey ASO! You have already settled your life in overseas and I do not think you need this money for survival. No matter what, you should not just listen your wife' instructions as a man. You should at least recall you father's image in this case.
BLACK & WHITE........BLACK & WHITE.......... BLACK & WHITE...........in one family.

Mike said...

Hi Fighting Peacock

I am a man and not related to Aung San Oo or his wife in any way whatsoever. It's very sad for anyone who can't inherit his or her parent's property fairly. If one is taking property away from someone else without consent, it's a kind of thief whether the other person is living in other country or on another planet.

The property is worth at least 20 million dollars. Aung San Oo is entitled to 10 millions you like it or not. He may decide not to do any politics and it should not make him not entitled to his parent's property. If he is not happy for Daw Su Kyi to have the whole house and she is not giving half of it away, it's a kind of mischief or misconduct.

Shame on you. A doctor's son may not practice medicine and lawyer's daughter may not become a lawyer. It's entirely up to the children. You are expecting too much upon Aung San Oo who decided to live his life as an engineer not as a politician. What's wrong with that? At the end of the day, we are all citizens of the earth and universe. Country boundaries are just arbitrary. From what you said, George Bush's daughters should become presidents. It doesn't work like that in real life. People have human rights to choose what they want to become.

Bottom line. Aung San Oo has chosen not to practice politics and he stays overseas. He has human rights to do so. It shouldn't give any rights to Daw Su Kyi to take his entitlement (half of the property which is worth 20 million dollars or more today market).

Fighting Peacock said...

Hi Mike,

What are you talking about? Did you find I blamed on Aung San Oo for NOT CHOOSING TO BE A POLITICIAN? Myanmar people just expected him to help them as a son of National Hero, General Aung San but would not blame him if he preferred to choose a simple lifestyle.

But he should not make a trouble to Daw Su at this point of time while she is struggling with many difficulties not for herself but for the country and people. She also has the ability to live in enjoyable and comfortable life with her family but decided to dedicate for the country that you or Aung San Oo had being never thought. We should respect and encourage to the person with holy spirit who did things that we cannot.

Again, has Daw Su already sold the house to enjoy her own life? We would not mind if Aung San Oo asked for his entitlement when Daw Su intend to sell the house and take the money for her own. Then they can settle shares between them as they wish. Do you understand the important of THE RIGHT-TIMING? I doubt so, you might be educated but it is obvious that you just owned a self-centred attitude and a narrow-minded person who had never thought about helping others although you seems understand on the unity and boundary-less thinking idea of the earth and universe .

I also do not understand on your actual intention of including doctor, lawyer and even George B.Bush' name in our discussion unnecessarily since we did not give any leading suggestion on the choosing of the person's own carrier path. You might want us to know that you lived in America or Europe and thinking of yourself as a superior than most of the people in Myanmar. No way mate! we cannot value you, no matter how educated you are, even as same as a million fraction of Daw Su who is contributing to the country and people with her utmost capacity.

You just kept talking about Money, money & money again and again in your comments but I cannot find even a single sympathized word for the suffering country and its people. WHO SHOULD BE THE ONE TO BE SHAME? YOU OR ME? LET'S PEOPLE WHO RED OUR COMMENTS DECIDE.

Well, you can kept yourself in THE THINKING OF MONEY-CIRCLE in that case and I now understand that it is a waste of my time to discuss with such a money-minded person. I feel like old Burmese saying "Playing a harp near a buffalo" now.

Anonymous said...

အခုမွဘဲ အမႈျပီးေတာ့တယ္
၀မ္းသာပါတယ္
အေမစုနိုင္သြားလို ့ေလ
အေမစုက်န္းမာပါေစ

Maung Maung said...

ဥပေဒရဲ႔အထက္မွာဘယ္သူမွမရိွသင့္ပါဘူး။ ဥပေဒနဲ႔မညီရင္လည္း ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးရႈံးမွာေပါ့။ ေမာင္ႏွမခ်င္း အေမြအတြက္ အမႈျဇစ္ရတာေတာ့ရွက္စရာပါ။ ဥပေဒကိုု ေလးစားတဲ့ ေဒၚစုုက ဥပေဒနဲ႔ညီတဲ့ ဆုုံးျဖတ္မႈဆိုု နာယူမွာပါ။ အခုုဟာက မိသားစုုျပသနာပါ။ ဒိုု႔ျပည္သူေတြအေနနဲ႔ ေဒၚစုုကိုု မွန္ကန္တဲ့နည္းလမ္းနဲ့ ကူညီၾကရေအာင္။

ep said...

ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးလိုေကာင္ကို ' ဦး ' ' ကေတာ္ ' ' ဇနီး ' ' ေဒၚ ' ေတြလို႕သံုးဖို႕မတန္ဘူးဗ် -- က်ဳပ္ေတာ့ မေရာက္ဖူးတဲ့ ေနရာေဒသအေၾကာင္းေတြ မေဟသီမွာ ေမတၱၱာဦးေရးတဲ့ ခရီးသြားေဆာင္းပါးဖတ္ေနက်ဗ် --- ေနာက္ေတာ့မွ အဲဒီ ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးဆိုတဲ့ေကာင္ရဲ့ မိန္းမ သိန္းလဲ့ႏြယ္ (လဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္သိန္း) ေရးမွန္းသိရတာ ---- သိရျပီးေနာက္ လုံးဝ (လုံးဝ)မဖတ္ေတာ့တာ ႏွစ္အေတာ္ၾကာေပါ့ ---- လူကိုမေျပာနဲ႕ -- စာကိုေတာင္ ရြံတယ္ ----

ep said...

ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးလိုေကာင္ကို ' ဦး ' ' ကေတာ္ ' ' ဇနီး ' ' ေဒၚ ' ေတြလို႕သံုးဖို႕မတန္ဘူးဗ် -- က်ဳပ္ေတာ့ မေရာက္ဖူးတဲ့ ေနရာေဒသအေၾကာင္းေတြ မေဟသီမွာ ေမတၱၱာဦးေရးတဲ့ ခရီးသြားေဆာင္းပါးဖတ္ေနက်ဗ် --- ေနာက္ေတာ့မွ အဲဒီ ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးဆိုတဲ့ေကာင္ရဲ့ မိန္းမ သိန္းလဲ့ႏြယ္ (လဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္သိန္း) ေရးမွန္းသိရတာ ---- သိရျပီးေနာက္ လုံးဝ (လုံးဝ)မဖတ္ေတာ့တာ ႏွစ္အေတာ္ၾကာေပါ့ ---- လူကိုမေျပာနဲ႕ -- စာကိုေတာင္ ရြံတယ္ ----

Mike said...

Hi Fighting Peacock

I can understand your point of view. If Aung San Oo is only 20 years old, he can wait. My point is that he is about 70 years old and he may want to donate to people including Myanmar or around the world. He may want to start something like "Aung San Oo's project" helping out many poor people around the world. He is too old to wait for next 20 years. He has already waited 20 yers or so but his sister chose to deny his entitlement because she may want to leave the house for her sons. Again I repeat, if you keep someone else's property (whole or part of it) without consent, it's a kind of thief.

Aung San Oo is entitled to 50% of the property which may be worth nothing or 100 millions. Full stop. We shouldn't blame him or his wife because he is asking for what he deserves. Even if 50% of the property is someone else's, Daw Suu Kyi should sell it quickly to be fair and square. Her character is more important than this house. She is not protecting her character as potential leader of the country by denying someone else's rights to own half of the property.

Selling the house SHOUDN'T prevent Daw Suu Kyi's campaign and she can rent a house or buy a very good house with 10 million dollars or so. Why can't she share her parent's property with her brother who is entitled to 50% whether he is citizen of united states or from another planet. She SHOULDN'T TAKE ADVANTAGE of him giving up Myanmar passport.

At the end of the day, she likes to be the leader of the country and she is not playing fair game even to her brother. For me, sell the house, give 50% to her brother, and buy a good hourse somewhere rather than behaving like someone on the street.

She is trying to embrace "democracy" but she is not acting in it's interest denying her own brother's entitlement being so selfish for herself and her sons.

I gave you examples of doctor's son not wanting to become a doctor or a lawyer's daughter deciding not to be a lawyer because people in Myanmar AUTOMATICALLY think Bo Gyoke's children should practice politics any how. It's wrong.

At the end of the day, people should play a fair game and Daw Suu Kyi needs to do so.

juju said...

To. A.S.O => တမန္လြန္ဘဝကမိဘေတြသိရင္ဘယ္ေလာက္ရင္နာေနမလဲ။ အာဇာနည္တစ္ဦးရဲ့သားျဖစ္တဲ့ဒင္းက ဒီလို မယက ႀကီးျဖစ္ေနရတာ ဒင္းမရွက္ေတာင္ ငါတို႔ေတြရွက္တယ္ .....

tertee said...

ကဲကဲ..ဒီေလာက္ေတာင္ မက္ေနတာ...
က်ေနာ္တုိ.အားလုံး ပိုက္ဆံစုထည္. ၿပီး ေပးလိုက္ၾကရေအာင္...
အေမြခြဲရင္ ဘယ္ေလာက္ရမွာ တုးံ...
တ တိုင္းၿပည္လုးံ စုထည္. ၿပီးေပးလိုက္မယ္...အေမစု စိတ္မညစ္ရေအာင္...ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္မ်က္ႏွာနဲ...တုိ.ေပးလိုက္ပါမယ္..
ေနာက္ထပ္ေတာ.မေႏွာင္.ယွက္ပါနဲ.ေတာ.....

thanhtik12 said...

ငါတို ့ျမန္မာျပည္မွာ မိဘတိုင္းကကြယ္ ဗိုလ္ေအာင္ဆန္းလို သူရဲေကာင္းေတြေမြးၾကရမယ္။အဲဒီလိုဂုဏ္ျပဳခံရတဲ့ တိုင္ျပည္ေခါင္ေဆာင္တစ္ေယာက္ရဲ႕ သားလိုေျပာရမွာမတန္ဘူး ေအာင္ဆန္းဦး

Alex Linn said...

သူတို႕ေမာင္ႏွမကိစၥ ပါ ေဝဖန္ပိုင္ခြင့္မရိွပါဘူး မိဘအေမြဆိုေတာ့လိုခ်င္မွာေပါ့ ေဒၚစုဘက္ကပဲတဖက္သက္ႀကည့္ေနႀကတာကိုး တဖက္ကိုလဲႀကည့္ႀကပါဦး မိဘအေမြေလ ကိုယ္ခ်င္းစာတရားနဲ႔စာနာၿပီးေျပာ သိန္းေပါင္းမ်ားစြာတန္တဲ႔အိမ္ကို နင္႔အလွည့္ႀကမွေပးလိုက္ အေမြဆိုင္တရားစြဲ မေနနဲ႔

MMT said...

Yes, Mike.
I agree with you.
We can see that Aung San Oo is now doing "Le Le Nwe Thein's project" helping out her relatives around the world.
Let's support him to do these project.

noung said...

ဘာလုပ္မွာလဲ ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦး ရယ္။ အေမစုကို စိတ္ညစ္စရာျဖစ္ေအာင္မလုပ္ပါနဲ့။က်ေနာ္ ေတာင္းပန္ပါတယ္ဗ်ာ
ဦးေက်ာ္သူေတာင္ သူ့ပိုင္ဆိုင္တဲ့ ရုပ္ရွင္ထုတ္လုပ္ေရး တခုလံုး
လွဴလိုက္တာဘဲ ဗ်ာ။ ဦးရဲ့ ညီမအရင္းေနာ္ ေျပးၾကည့္မွ ဒီေမာင္ႏွမ
နွစ္ေယာက္ဘဲ ရွိေတာ့တာပါဗ်ာ။

Unknown said...

Mike,

Good day to you.
May I ask you ? Are are you U ASO's wife ? look like same person.
I have noticed that you are keep giving pressure to all readers to abit blar...on Daw Su and her elder brother. By law we can right to say half by half share (share her parent's property with her brother who is entitled to 50% whether he ............... ).
p.s - I myself also havn't get my share from Mum:

Regarding my suggestion here, please wait awhile because I can gurantee you our Daw Su kindness on people meanig mean including her only one brother.
Dear Mike,
You should know time and situation of our country.
Please do co-operate with people.
I love our national hero General Aung San daughte and son, when I compare to the others hero or famous person in our Myanmar history.

With nothing special to personal on you,
RASU88

WiDura said...

hi everyone
u aung san oo may not sue daw su. he should think carefully before he take as another citizen.
the property rate is too high in Yangon, one square feet in that area is above four lakhs nowadays and it's going to increase 'cause the economy of Myanmar is likely to boom...i think their land is more than an acre(43,560sq ft /acre) and their land is also aside of Inya lake, so the price will be much higher...
and another additional value, the property were once owned by the wife (daw khin kyi) of General Ag San (our national hero)and the land is replacement of BOGYOKE MUSEUM. and now daw su (people leader) has in possession...so it already has historical value and will be too much more historical value after daw su...
one day it could be DAW SU MUSEUM...
suppose the judges let u ag san oo won the case, the property has to divide into two and i sincerely believe he would have to sell the land to others if he wants to donate the poor(like mike said)...
according to the law point of view, he's not entitle to any piece. reverse this case' as in STATES if daw su sue u ag san oo she will have a less hope to win the case.
this is not just a normal/personal case, i guess, judges may ask consent of people and govt.to decide fairly... I'm not saying who is right or wrong...cause we r experiencing a democratic process ...
what do u think...?

nay lin said...

Mike,
Here’s what fighting peacock and the rest of us are trying to enlighten you.
Aung San Oo
(1) is an egoistic greedy b*tch or at least that is he will be in the eye of the Burmese people. This more or less sums up everything but somehow you seem to have problem with the fact.
(2) is never seen identifying himself with Burmese people and never seen showing any empathy or sympathy towards the people much less doing anything for the country.
• That is totally fine as he is entitled the free will as any other free man. We wouldn’t condemn him except I’d personally pity him somehow, that he’s missed an opportunity of a lifetime not trying. But I hope he or any of his supporters don’t expect any favorable view from Burmese people in return when he pits himself against the most revered icon of the country like Daw Su. If they do, it’d be nothing but misery for them because there won’t be any. That is how things work, if you don’t notice, you reap what you sow and Trust don’t come easy.
(3) is suspected of taking it far as much as working together with Junta in the past to cause inconvenience to Daw Su. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/aung-san-suu-kyi-a-leaking-roof-and-the-brother-who-wont-let-her-fix-it-1889040.html . Could there be a respectable reason for a brother to go to court so that his sister can’t fix the leak in the house she’s staying?
Now your messed-up arguments goes
(1) Aung San Oo is 70 yrs old so that he needs this money ASAP since “he may want to donate” by starting “something like “Aung San Oo’s project””?
• [I’m sorry that he’s 70yrs old. Oops! Nope I’m joking I’m not . I won’t be sorry much when he’s gone either. It’s a sad truth that people gets old and die when it’s time. People will feel for you if you’re worthy for them to be. I’m sad that Daw Su is at this age. I wish Daw Su 20 years younger or more since she’s sacrificed that much or more for the people. (Well this maybe beside the point… )]
• Your’s would be as weak an argument as it could be unless you do have some solid evidence of it as an insider but you already have claimed contrary so I’d just take this as a speculation.
• Once I take this as speculation, meaning we could have counter speculations as much as we would want. Maybe he wants to use that money to buy a Yacht, fool around, get mistresses if he’s still capable (well that may not be possible from what we’re hearing about her wife)- oh so may be his wife can buy Rolls Royce, start a reality show instead of just writing travel pieces since TV could help to boost one’s ego way better than some inconspicuous magazine columns?
• Not only that this is a fact you’re just speculating, there’s much further evidence to prove that he’s not a charity guy. I’m not gonna spend time here and anything on his wife, if you could read around, would prove it since I doubt there’s much about Aung San Oo himself you can find out anyways.
• My point here is that it’s ridiculous to suddenly speculate a charitable cause to support that that he deserves it as most of the available known facts points otherwise.

nay lin said...

(2) “Aung San Oo is entitled to 50%” which is about “10 million” or “100 million?
• I find it quite intriguing at the same time amusing that you seems to be obsessed with that number. Where do you get that 10 or 100 million, and why are you so sure about those numbers.
• Either way the fact that you have more interest in money Aung San Oo should get rather than more pressing concerns in our country is very suspicious when you’re claiming you have no relation whatsoever. Is it that you shared same fate? You had a sister who took your parents property without sharing with you so that you feel so much and start wring very long arguments for Aung San Oo? If that is the case, all this would probably make sense- who knows.
• Another point is on “Entitlement”. How could you talk about such a complicate case of inheritance as a simple cake sharing session? Hey bro, Mom bought a cake so let’s cut it half and share- is that what you’re thinking? What a childish judgement you’re trying to pass here. Parent’s will, law that governs inheritance, society norms, religious views, principles and views people personally hold- nothing can be more complicated when it comes to inheritance- furthermore nationality and country and people’s take on real estate ownership are serious considerations you can’ just dismiss by simply citing we’re all “citizens of earth”. Or I’d go with your argument if you could share your wealth with me- I’ll send you my bank accnt number and continue the discussion. How about that?
There’re still like Tons of arguments popping up in my head right now- like a number of folks here are pointing out – historical, and heritage value and considerations as a place of our national leaders instead of just seeing it for monetary value. But I’ll stop here since this is getting too long and I think I’ve had enough pointers for you.
My point is- in our view, Aung San Oo is an egoistic b*tch, period. He can of course go ahead and continue to do whatever he wants to do together with his ungrateful wife, but don’t try to convince us that he’s doing anything right for whatever frame of context and get symphaty from us. NOPE sir, he’s not and we won’t.

Unknown said...

ASO wannna donate where??
(thardu) 2 times,,,,'
coming soon other 1 later,,xoxo!...
:D
calm dowm.......guys....

Unknown said...

Mike,

I am RASU88 here again,
I hope we all are right noe in front of PC to give our free time for sharing some +ve thinking. Please cool down Mike. This issue is not normal state we are taking discussion. I don't talk big base on my level.
May I ask you the person name of you are using sender name Mike is Daw Thein Let Nwe former husband name ? (smoeone mentioned above comment her exhusband ).
Mr. Nay Lin said greatful lesson and Mr. Wi Du Ra as well.
Please don't take advantageous on U ASO during this time.
Myit Tar Mon visiting around the world for what reason ? for country, nation , personal ??? what ???
Sorry ! I am notnice to ask you. I better stop my comment.

RASU88

ေမတၲာရွင္ said...

ေဟ႕ေကာင္ငဦး ေလးေပ ေၿခာက္ေပ အကြက္ေတြအေမြေပးမယ္။ မင္းရယ္
မင္းမိန္းမ မိသားစု၀င္ေတြအတြတ္ပါေပးမယ္။ ဘယ္ႏွစ္ေရာက္စာလဲေၿပာ။
ေနာက္ၿပီး ငရဲၾကီး ရွစ္ထပ္ မွာ ဘယ္ ငရဲ သြားလည္ခ်င္လဲေၿပာ၊ ဗီဇာ ပါေပးလိုက္မယ္။

WiDura said...

hi everyone!
in another way, u ag san oo shall let go of this case. letting her sister to manage that property can also be defined as donation to our people & country... i sincerely believe that daw su will never sell that land for her own good or even transfer to her descendants in any ways & any means. do u agree? wait and see.
i think she'd handle wisely to do something effective to our people... lets say if that property became DAW SU MUSEUM after her, u ag san oo shall proud of her sister (which means that MUSEUM is a donation to 60 millions myanmar people- incl. poor to rich)
which is better...? *she might transfer to govt., to her party, to local NGOs or whatever ...
my point of view, bro and sis matters in court is not an appropriate case...
however, i just want to end this case peacefully... 'cause we r buddhist and myanmar people.. isn't there any fine negotiators...?
regards to all...

Once Myanmar said...

Hi Mike,

I think you should understand Myanmar peoples' spirit and vision now.

You seem understanding to be out of the box and think about the whole picture by mentioning "The earth, universe, planet, arbitrary & boundary -less" when it concerns with sharing MONEY but your scope was suddenly and purposely narrowed down and blinded on true factors when talking about The Lady Daw Su's character.

You pretended forget or ignored her simultaneous activities and scarification to the country and its people and keep accusing her as a kind of thief, mischief, misconduct, behaving like someone on the street, bad character, so selfish for her and her sons, etc. That's too much!!!!

Such one-sided biased accusations made us much more painful than insulting directly on us.

You ignored many easily visible facts and keep talking about MONEY and SHARING.
- I don't think you do not know the current law in Myanmar. Did U Aung San Oo entitle any possession under that law?
- Do you really think Mother Su is just expecting such Monetary Value from that house rather than historical, sentimental value and as a historic ground for the transformation to the democracy to be fulfil his father's unfinished desire for the country and its people?
- Is it possible Mother Su is scarifying, even possibly her own life, to get such money from this house and would get away once it was done?
- Don't you understand that she can easily get very rich like other Myanmar TYCOONS if she chose to ignore suffering people and request favourable and profitable projects/permits from REGIME under the influence of her father's name long time ago?

Those all above are true, transparent and can be easily seen by people about Mother Su's real character and your speculations about U Aung San Oo's future plan and contributions to the society were just imagination and hard to believe possibilities.

You said you have no bias and not related to U Aung San Oo or HIS WIFE in any way whatsoever. For us, it was a hard to believe claim based on your strong accusation to Mother Su with such bias regarding THIS PARTICULAR MONEY. In your the first comment, you started challenge to the people who supported Mother Su and against her brother in the case. Challenging people for no reason? Is that just your own arrogance character?

To U AUNG SAN OO,

We have basically already respected you for being the son of National Hero, General Aung San .

We would appreciate you and keep our respect to you if you do not give any trouble to Mother Su who is risking her own safety and even life for the country and people that you cannot do.

Please understand that Mother Su would not do such life risking scarification if she just considered about money. She would come, sell the house, left the country and enjoy with her family like you.

Under the current Myanmar Law, you can only expect that share in the case of Mother Su remained as Myanmar Citizenship, DO NOT LOSE HER LIFE during the revolution and the last, she choose to sell the house for money and willing to share it with you as a brother but not empowered by the Law. You can see that it was entirely depend on her situation and her will at this moment unless changing Myanmar Law and thus we would appreciate if you can avoid ugly confrontation with her to happy REGIME supporters.

We sincerely hope that you would support your sister's honesty, integrity and personal value than your wife's enjoyable life, traveling costs and getting experiences from traveling to share with people on the pages of the magazine at least on the account of your father General Aung San.
Thank you.

လေရာင္ဝါ said...

အပိုေတြ သိပ္လုပ္ႀကတာပဲ

Mike said...

Hi Nay Lin

[{ (1) is an egoistic greedy b*tch or at least that is he will be in the eye of the Burmese people. This more or less sums up everything but somehow you seem to have problem with the fact. }]

No. You're wrong. He has decided to stay abroad and practice as an engineer as per his free will. What's wrong with that? Also Daw Suu Kyi spent many years abroad and if it was not her coming back to look after her mother in around 1988, she would have stayed on happily abroad.

[{ (2) is never seen identifying himself with Burmese people and never seen showing any empathy or sympathy towards the people much less doing anything for the country. }]

How do you know what he feels inside? Do you think all Burmese people living abroad don't have any empathy or sympathy towards their people. It's WRONG PRE-ASSUMPTION. Some Burmese people have to stay abroad because of situation in Burma and it shouldn't mean we don't have any sympathy to Burmese people.


[{ • Once I take this as speculation, meaning we could have counter speculations as much as we would want. Maybe he wants to use that money to buy a Yacht, fool around, get mistresses if he’s still capable (well that may not be possible from what we’re hearing about her wife)- oh so may be his wife can buy Rolls Royce, start a reality show instead of just writing travel pieces since TV could help to boost one’s ego way better than some inconspicuous magazine columns? }]

What's wrong with giving away his OWN AND DESERVED money or buying a yacht or even a mansion? If you expect him to donate all his money, try to do it first with your own money. Give up your own home for Burmese people first.

It's TOTALLY WRONG to judge other people when you're yourself not able to donate your house or your money. If your sister is keeping your money unlawfully, how would you feel?

AGAIN BOTTOM LINE. He is entitled to half of his parent's property regardless of whether he is a pirate or a prince or a president. Full stop. DON'T EXPECT people to give away their entitlement because of his or her sister doing a political campaign. Daw Suu Kyi should be able to proceed with her political campaign even if she lives in a camp rather than a big house like hers right now. She shouldn't need this house to practice her politics. She should be fair to her own brother not taking advantage of him giving up his Burmese passport if she really believe in human rights and democracy.

komyo said...

ၿမန္မာၿပည္မွာလူဦးေရသန္းေၿခာက္ဆယ္ေက်ာ္ရွိတဲ ့အထဲက သန္းငါးဆယ္
ေက်ာ္ေသာလူေတြက အေမစု ကိုေထာက္ခံအားေပး ၀ိုင္း၀င္းခ်ီးေၿမွာက္ၾကဖို ့
၀န္မေလးၾကပါဘူး အဲဒီေတာ ့ လူတေယာက္ကိုတစ္က်ပ္ပဲစုၿပီးေပးရင္ေတာင္မွ
ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦး မိန္းမ လိုခ်င္ေနတဲ ့အေမြ က်ပ္ေငြလားေဒၚလာလား?
အဲဒါေတြကိုစုၿပီးေပးလိုက္ရင္ရပါတယ္ လိုခ်င္တဲ ့အေမွာက္ကိုသာေၿပာပါ။
ဒီအိမ္ၾကီးကိုေတာ ့ ဘယ္လိုမွအၿဖက္စီးမခံနိုင္ပါ

Phyo Naung said...

RASU88,

You are very naughty! You should not ask MIKE such question whether he is DAW THEIN LE NWE's former husband if you are not sure.

How if he is her current ke...ng who is expecting some share?

Better we should collect money from all Myanmar Citizens for U Aung San Oo as KO MYO and TERTEE said or select alternative payment as MITTER SHIN's advice.

Hahahahaha.

Mike said...

Hi Once Myanmar

[{You ignored many easily visible facts and keep talking about MONEY and SHARING.
- I don't think you do not know the current law in Myanmar. Did U Aung San Oo ..........
- Do you really think Mother Su is just expecting such Monetary Value from that house rather than historical ...........
- Is it possible Mother Su is scarifying, even possibly her own life ..........
- Don't you understand that she can easily get very rich like other Myanmar TYCOONS if she chose to ..........}]

Law is law, one's conscience is above the law. Even if the law does favor Daw Suu Kyi, her conscience should lead her to act in a fair way to anyone including her own brother. Even if the house belongs to someone from another planet, she shouldn't take it like that.

Who cares about these historical things, blah, blah? There's already Bo Gyoke Aung San's museum. One should be enough. I am not against Bo Gyoke but some people said Myanmar would be much better under English than having Independence. Look at Hong Kong, they have improved a lot under English government and they prosper. For me, I don't mind who the government is. Even if the governemnt is from another planet, as long as people in the country can live life to good standard, and at least gets basic human rights, I am happy with that.

I don't automatically support someone because he or she is someone else's son or daughter. I judge depending upon their merit, intension, their character and ability to do things. To be honest, I am not impressed with Daw Suu Kyi who is nowhere near to top leaders like Obama etc.....

aungmoecheng said...

ေသခ်ာစဥ္းစားပါ ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးရယ္ ေမာင္ႏွမခ်င္း အေမလုတာ ေက်ာ္မေကာင္းၾကားမေကာင္းပါကြာ ျမန္မာ့အတြက္ ရွက္မိတယ္။
တိုင္းျပည္ကုိ တိုးတက္ေအာင္မကူခ်င္ေနပါေစ တိုးတက္ေအာင္လုပ္ေဆာင္ေနတဲ့ ေဒၚစုကုိ စိတ္အေႏွာက္ အယွက္ျဖစ္ေအာင္ အခုေရာ ေႏွာင္ပါ မလုပ္ေတာ့ပါနဲ႕ကြာ။။။။။။။

MMT said...

က်ြဲပါးေစာင္းတီး။ ႏြားပလာေကြ်း ဆုိတာ ဒါေခၚလားပဲ။ ဒီအမႈမွာ အေမစုဘက္က ျပည္သူေတြမေျပာနဲ ့ စစ္အစုိးရဘက္က ေနာက္လုိက္ေတြေတာင္ ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးလုိ ေကာင္ ကုိ ေထာက္ခံမယ္မထင္ပါ။
ဒါျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသား ပုိင္ဆုိင္ခြင့္ နဲ ့ အေမရိကန္ႏုိင္ငံသား ပုိင္ဆုိင္ခြင့္ ကိစၥ
ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံကုိ ခ်စ္တဲ့ ဘယ္ေကာင္မွ ျမန္မာျပည္ေျမကုိိ အေမရိကန္ ႏုိင္ငံသား လက္ထဲမထည့္ပါ။ ရွင္းလား Mike ?

ရာရာ said...

NYW & Mike,....ခပ္လြယ္လြယ္ပဲေတြးၾကည္႔ရေအာင္...ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ ဆိုတာ ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္အတြက္ သူ႔ရဲ႕ အသက္၊ သူ႔ရဲ႕ ဘ၀ တစ္ခုလုံးအပါအ၀င္ အကုန္လုံးကို လွစ္လ်ဴရွဳၿပီး ၿမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအတြက္ အခ်ိန္ၿပည္႔အလုပ္လုပ္ေနတဲ႔သူ ဆိုတာကို ႏိုင္ငံသားအားလုံး (သိသိၾကီးၿဖင္႔ မသိခ်င္ေယာင္ေဆာင္ေနေသာသူမ်ားအပါအ၀င္)သိၾကပါတယ္။ ဒါ႔ေၾကာင္႔ ဒီ ပစၥည္းဥစၥာကိုလိုခ်င္တပ္မက္တဲ႔စိတ္ တစ္ခုေၾကာင္႔ ဒီအမွဳကိုရင္ဆုိင္ၿခင္းလုံး၀မဟုတ္ဘူးဆိုတာ ယုံၾကည္ပါတယ္။ တစ္ၿခား ခင္ဗ်ားတို႔က်ဳပ္တို႔မသိႏိုင္တဲ႔ ေနာက္ကြယ္က အေၾကာင္းၿခင္းရာတစ္ခုေၾကာင္႔လို႔ ခန္႔မွန္းမိပါတယ္။ ဒါ႔ေၾကာင္႔ ဒီကိစၥကို ခပ္တိမ္တိမ္ခပ္လြယ္လြယ္ မွတ္ခ်က္ၿပဳဖို႔ မသင္႔ေတာ္ေၾကာင္း ေၿပာလိုပါတယ္

ရာရာ said...

Mike,
ေနာက္တစ္ခ်က္ေၿပာစရာက်န္ပါေသးတယ္...ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ကိုေထာက္ခံအားေပးတဲ႔လူထု ဟာ ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ရဲ႕သမီးတစ္ေယာက္ဆုိတာထက္ ပိုၿပီး သူ(မ)ရဲ႔စြန္႔လြတ္စြန္႔စားမွဳ၊ သူ(မ)ရဲ႕ေခါင္းေဆာင္စြမ္းရည္၊ ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္အေပၚ တကယ္ေစတနာထားမွဳ၊ ကိုယ္က်ိဳးစြန္႔မွဳ၊ ထက္ၿမက္ၿပီးၿပတ္သားတဲ႔စိတ္ဓါတ္ တုိ႔ကို အေလးအနက္ထားၾကတာပါ။..ဒါေတြမရိွခဲ႔ရင္ ၿပည္သူလူထုရင္ထဲမွာလည္းဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ရဲ႕ ရင္ေသြးတစ္ေယာက္ထက္ပုိၿပီး အသိအမွတ္ၿပဳဖို႔ မရိွပါဘူး...။ ဒီအရည္အေသြးေတြဟာလည္း သူ႔မမွာဒါေတြရိွပါတယ္လို႔ ဟစ္ေၾကြးေနရင္း ရခဲ႔တာမဟုတ္ပါဘူး။ ၿပည္သူလူထုက သူ(မ)ရဲ႕လုပ္ရပ္ေတြစြမး္ေဆာင္ႏိုင္မွဳေတြကို အကဲၿဖတ္ၿပီး ၿပည္သူေတြကိုယ္တိုင္သတ္မွတ္ခဲ႔တဲ႔ အရည္အေသြးေတြပါ။..အကယ္၍ ေနာက္ထပ္အခ်ိန္ေတြမွာ ဒီအရည္အေသြးေတြဟာ သံသယၿဖစ္ဖြယ္ရိွလာၿပီဆိုရင္ေတာ႔ ၿပည္သူလူထုရဲ႕ စိတ္ထဲမွာလည္း ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ရဲ႕သမီးတစ္ေယာက္ထက္ပိုေတာ႔မွာမဟုတ္ပါဘူး..။ လူထုရဲ႕ယုံၾကည္မွဳေတြဟာ တစ္ၿခား ဘယ္အဖြဲ႔အစည္းကပဲၿဖစ္ၿဖစ္( ခင္ဗ်ားေၿပာသလို ဘယ္ၿဂိဳလ္က ဘယ္သူပဲၿဖစ္ၿဖစ္)တစ္ကယ္လုပ္ႏိုင္တဲ႔သူ၊ တစ္ကယ္လုပ္ေပးမယ္႔သူဆီကိုပဲ ေရြ႕သြားမွာၿဖစ္ပါတယ္ လုိ႔ဆိုခ်င္ပါတယ္။

san san said...

သိရသေလာက္က အဲ့ဒီ လဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္သိန္းဆိုတာ ဆရာဝန္တဦးလို႕ထင္ပါတယ္။မွားရင္လဲခြင့္လႊတ္ပါ။၁၉၈၁ ခုနွစ္တံုးက ၇န္ကုန္ေဆး ရုံၾကီးမွာ ဝန္ထမ္း ဘဝတုန္းက ခြဲစိတ္ေဆာင္ ၇နဲ႕ ၈မွာ ေဒါက္တာ လဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္သိန္းဆိုတာ ၾကားဘူးခဲ့တယ္။ေတြ႕ဘူးခဲ့တယ္။အရမ္းေပြရွုပ္တဲ့ သူပါ။အဲ့ဒီတုန္းက ခြဲစိတ္ဆရာဝန္တဦးနဲ႕ညိွ႕ေနတယ္။ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးကလဲအေမရိကန္နိုင္ငံသားျဖစ္ေနျပီး။ဒီလိုလုပ္လို႔မရဘူးေလ။

maymon said...

သရဖူmagazine လစဥ္ခရီးသြားေဆာင္းပါးေတြေရးေနတဲ့စာေရးဆရာမ
ေမတၱာဦးဆုိတာေအာင္ဆန္းဦးမိန္းမ ေဒၚလဲ့လဲ့ႏြယ္သိန္းေပါ့။
သရဖူအယ္ဒီတာေဒၚနန္အိဇာကုိအံ့ၾသတာလြတ္လပ္ေရးဖခင္ဗုိိလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္
ဆန္းသမီးကုိစိတ္ဆင္းရဲေအာင္လုပ္ေနတဲ့သူ႔ေဆာင္းပါးေတြေဖာ္ျပေနတာပါ။
အာဏာရွင္ေတြလက္ကုိင္တုတ္ေတြကပုံစံအမ်ိဳးမ်ိဳးနဲ႔ရွိေနတာမွာပါပဲ။

min yar zar said...

ေၾသာ္. ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးရယ္...ခင္ဗ်ားသာ အေမစုလိုပဲ ေမာင္နွစ္မနွစ္ေယာက္ အတူတကြ တိုင္းျပည္အက်ိဳး၊ ျပည္သူ့ အက်ိဳးသယ္ပိုးခဲ့မယ္ ဆိုရင္ အေမြေတာင္းစရာမလိုပါဘူ။ အဲဒီရမဲ့ အေမြထက္မက ျပည္သူကေပးမွာပါ။ တရားကိုနတ္ေစာင့္ပါတယ္၊ အေမြဆိုတာ ထိုက္မွရတာပါ။ by the way, ေဒၚခင္ၾကည္ဆုံးတုန္းက ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးကို ဘယ္ေနရာမွာမွ မေတြ့မိပါလားေနာ္၊ အဲဒီတုန္းက ဘယ္ေရာက္ေနလဲ၊ အေမစုရဲ့ မိသားစုကိုပဲ သမိုင္း၀င္ ေတြ့မိပါတယ္။

ဲွKaung said...

Good Read this!

ဒါျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသား ပုိင္ဆုိင္ခြင့္ နဲ ့ အေမရိကန္ႏုိင္ငံသား ပုိင္ဆုိင္ခြင့္ ကိစၥ
ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံကုိ ခ်စ္တဲ့ ဘယ္ေကာင္မွ ျမန္မာျပည္ေျမကုိိ အေမရိကန္ ႏုိင္ငံသား လက္ထဲမထည့္ပါ။
ရွင္းလား Mike ?

Unknown said...

Mr. WeDuRa,
I do not know how old you are, let me put Mr. in front of your name fast.
Yah ! I agree with your idea for selling the properties land base on current valuation price. because U ASO want to donate correct ?
but don't let him take cash.
I mean something look like U Kyaw Thu donated his studio complex for General Aung San films.
Mike,
Do you agree ? If you agree, we will try to collect minimum one dollar per head from local and oversea myanmar. If you lucky you may can more than that what you expected amount S$ 20 0r 40 Millions.
( Sorry I am not asking your luck, but I asked ASO's wife).

p.s - I wanted to know " May I know who are you Mike ?

Nice to comment you.
RASU88

myatlwin said...

Hi Mike,

Are you sure Aung San Oo want to donate his money to myanmar people as your words "Her brother may want to use the money (I think it will be about 10 million dollars) to enjoy life in the remaining years or even may decide to donate for a good cause."?Show us where he donate any of small amount for myanmar people.
Please keep in your mind as this is myanmar,not USA.Different countries had their own rule.Never be the same.Don't mix human right and country law.If Aung San Oo can change back to myanmar citizen in future,we will discuss again.At the time of being, super sorry mike, stay away from Daw Aung San Su Kyi.OK????

Once Myanmar said...

Hi Mike,

You are really closing your eye, keep talking like a crazy guy and insulting Mother Su!

No wondered FIGHT PEACOCK said he feels like "Playing a harp near a buffalo" and what MMT said. You deserved it!

Don't talk too big like A SUPER THINKER! Every country has their Law. Can you neglect it? Try with any country in the world or even in the planet, go there, break their law and then see what you will happen. In that case, you should try with a developed country Singapore first. They will show you how their law means.

Myself and YAR YAR already explained why Myanmar people admired Mother Su, not just because of the daughter of General Aung San but mainly based on her will, scarification, braveness, the ability, the performance, etc. Do you looked down Myanmar people and thought we do not have ability to judge one person's character? We would definitely not appreciate if Mother Su did wrong things but she has being proved her great character to us.

You don't know how to appreciate historical & sentimental values and to surprise, you even do not mind who would govern in your country. We, Myanmar people, are very pleased that such person like you do not exist in our land.

You have mentioned that "some people said Myanmar would be much better under English than having Independent". You must be wrong! it should not be "INDEPENDENT" but "THE REGIME". I believed that that saying came from people who suffered under REGIME at that time and they would be united again when it come to the National issue such as the other country attack Myanmar. You can ask all Myanmar people if you don't believe it. They are not like you.

Of course, it is exceptional for some ethics who see Burmese (Bamar) as a different nationality due to cruel suppression of REGIME. I can also understand their feeling at this moment but I believed that they would feel as ONE MYANMAR CITIZEN after building DEMOCRACY in the country with fair facilities. Our history has already proved that.

As conclusion, same as you to be honest, we also don't impress your idea, thinking way and comments to Mother Su. Full Stop!

Mike said...

MMT and Kaung

You two are very narrow minded. There are many Burmese people who become citizens of other countries due to certain circumstances rather than just because of their wishes.

The same can be argued why Daw Suu Kyi got married to a foreigner. One may say, she doesn't care about Burma and her father and she got married to a foreigner. To be honest, I am not impressed with what she had done. She even asked for continuation or renewal of sanctions and it's not good for Burmese people and it's not in the best interest of the public.

Debates can be endless and will go on forever. Bottom line here is her conscience, her character and nothing else.

Clear? MMT or Kaung!!!! Do you need more explanation?

Mike said...

Hi Phyo Naung

It's reverse what you said. Your words look like coming from a gay guy born out of a prostitute and you don't seem to have a proper father who can teach you how to behave like a good person.

Sounds like someone came to your mother (prostitute)'s house and Fxxk her and you were born as a result.

Discuss decently and don't use prostitute or gay words.

Okay?

Phyo Naung said...

Mummy Mike or Mi Mi Le Nwe,

You are trying to bite like A MAD FEMALE DOG to the people around you. I will not polite to the person like you who insulted Daw Su. Clear?

Who said he/she would be comfortable with no matter who is your father?

Don't worry! Come to Myanmar. We would assure you a comfortable life and prepare a brothel for you all. Just bring yourself and all your female relatives who share the same thinking with you.

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Fighting Peacock said...

Hi Mike,

It is true that there are many Burmese people who become citizens of other countries under certain circumstances. But you should not pretend you are representing all of them with the same thinking idea. We don't want the current Myanmar Citizens look down on such persons.

Do you understand that most of them still love their Mother Land and they would support in different ways to whom can make the country develop? It is not for themselves since they have already taken other citizenship but with sympathy for the rest of suffering people in the country. They would respect to whom can scarify for the country although they cannot do it.

They would not see just money face like you and insult Daw Su.

Please put your thinking as your own idea and behave it yourself. DO NOT REPRESENT YOURSELF AS OTHERS.

WiDura said...

hi everyone,
some says u ag san oo own a mansion with wide land on a river bank in BAGAN, not a concrete info., can anyone confirm it right or wrong ? if it's right..., how could he legally holds the documents under his name as if he were american... I'm so confusing...

zy said...

ဦးေအာင္ဆန္းဦးလိုအေျခအေနနဲ႔ ဒီအိမ္အေမြတ၀က္ရသြားရင္ေတာင္ ဘယ္ေလာက္သိသာမွာမုိ႔လို႔လဲ။ ကိုယ္သိကၡာကို ငဲ့ကြက္ျပီး ဒီေလာက္ေငြကို မမက္သင့္ပါ။ ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ရဲ့မ်က္ႏွာကိုေထာက္ထားျပီး အမႈကို ျပန္ရုတ္သိမ္းေပးပါ။ အတိုင္းတို္င္း အျပည္ျပည္ ၾကားလို႔မွ မေကာင္းပါဘူး။ တုိင္းျပည္သိကၡာလဲက်ပါတယ္။

moah said...

hi mike,

i have read all of these comments as you are the only one who is fighting with everyone for the sake of aung san oo and his wife. is there any advantage for u to do so. i know you have human right to talk what you want if those words are not hurting other people. if so, this is not called democracy but it is abusing. and you can see all of the people respect aung san suu kyi no matter what she married a foreigner but she did many good things for our people unlike aung san oo. you can never compare that. i wanna ask you if you are getting any profit for gossiping about aung san suu kyi or this is your personal hatred? i wonder....

Unknown said...

Mike,

G'day.


Please don't mentioned Phyo Naung vulgar words.
Actually ! I also want to use those words to Thein Let Nwe. As you review on top comment - someone was already said her as a ungreatful woman, who was a little big higher than prostitute grade or another way to call like this woman, we call behind her name is KK mean"she wish to bend down and give her ASO to who she like it" ). Do you understand my transition ? As our school time we are using Myanmar two words only do you know? Not nice to type here respect to readers and I also don't have experience to type Myanmar fronts.
So you lucky again ! by the way want to ask you
"Do you know how to read Myanmar words ?
For me I can read and write. Are you English man ?
But I am not sure and also still not confirm yet who you are ?
that why I have try to hold vulgar bullets before fire you.
If you want it, you should open your chest bravely or say out now Who are you ?
Are you behalf of ASO'wife or you are the one making me involve here to comment again and again... I want to stop but still can not stop it unless you tell me who you are.
We are man and I hope you also man.
In fact-I have two serious thinking on my mind.
First one is you must be Thein Let Nwe.
Second one is you must be her lawer.
Which one correct ?
Mike,
Importantly and kindly remind to you as per your comment above
" why Daw Suu Kyi got married to a foreigner "
My answer is
" I knew that junta like to point this view of lower standand -ve thinking since 1989 but Daw Su gave answer to our peoples when she went to organization trips to every towns in Myanmar.
Do you know or You forgotten ? May I ask you
If you live in Shwe Bo long time, who will you be married ?
Don't tell me against " I never marriage for long life "
same thing to get share feeling yourself behalf of Daw Su young time in oversea life.
If Daw Su live in Shwe Bo long time, She will marry with either Shwe Bo man or Mandalay, Yangon somewhere in Myanmar man depend on her visiting to the pagodas.

I try to explain to you by my knowledge whether you can follow me or not I am not sure but up to you.
Perhaps- I know You know
I am not good harp player and you also not wild buffalo.
Please reconsider to change your mindset to improve +ve for democracy way.

Without personal attack on you.
Good night (ASIAN Time)
RASU88

Once Myanmar said...

Hi Phyo Naung,

We understand your anger on the person who insulted Mother Su with RUDE WORDS but please be patient and do not use VULGAR WORDS. Some people dared to touch others but do not dare to receive any scratch when their turn.

Hi GENTLEMAN Mike,

You called for a challenge during your first comment but why you cannot be patient and correct PHYO NAUNG with gentleman manner when he gave some reflection on you? Did Mother Su response you the same way while she has been insulted by you very rudely? You showed your true colour now.

Your thinking way, your behaviour & character and YOUR INTEREST IN THIS SPECIFIC MONEY pointing us to someone although you said that you are not related to Aung San Oo or HIS WIFE in any way whatsoever.

I DO NOT HAVE ANYMORE DESIRE TO DISCUSS WITH SUCH A LOW-CLASS PERSON.

MMT said...

Mike said,
က်ေနာ္ဟာ ျမန္မာလုိ မရုိက္တတ္၊ ျမန္မာနာမည္မရွိတဲ့ (ျမန္မာနာမည္အမွန္ မေျပာရဲတဲ့) ျမန္မာပိုင္ေျမကုိ အေမရိကန္ႏုိင္ငံသား လက္ထဲဖုိ ့ ႀကိဳးစားေနတဲ့ အသားထဲကထြက္တဲ့ ေလာက္ တေကာင္ပါ။

Wai Lar Ko Ko said...

ရာဇဝင္တြင္မယ့္လူဆိုးအၿဖစ္သမိုင္းစာမ်က္ႏွာမွာပါသြားပါၿပီ။
႕မန္ေတာိတို့ရဲ့ဇာတ္ေဆာင္မင္းသမီးၾကီးအေမစုကေတာ့ဆက္လက္ၿပီးၿခိမ့္ၿခိမ့္သဲေအာင္ၿမင္မွဳေတြရပါေတာ့မယ္။
ၿပည္သူမ်ားေပ်ာ္ရႊင္စြာၿဖတ္သန္းရမယ့္ေန႔ရက္ေတြမၾကာခင္မွာေရာက္ရွိလာပါေတာ့မယ္။

ကိုဆိတ္ၾကီး said...

I am very concerned with the moderator allowing such insinuating comments on a well respected figure (DASSK) by an unknown person followed by vicious exchange of comments in utter vulgarity. They were totally off the topic and out of context as well. And the story did not explain whether it was about a new lawsuit or an appeal on previous court decision. The year of the events were out of order.

adin1988 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Phyo Naung said...

Once Myanmar, RASU88, Horney Goat & All readers,

I apologised to all readers for vulgar words to this guy/lady when I commented early and I APOLOGISED AGAIN for it.
He deserved more and I also understand no good for readers. He insulted Amy Su first & then the country by "BETTER UNDER ENGLISH" and "I DON'T MIND WHO THE GOVERNMENT IS". You can see how "MYO MA SIT" he is.
My words have the reason and not created myself. I JUST TRANSLATED HIS MEANING FROM A COUNTY TO A FAMILY LEVEL. My weakness is poor in English and cannot find POLITE WORDS for his idea. I am no good in explaining him like others.
Thank you to ADIN1988 and everybody who played a harp nicely for him.
PHYO NAUNG

Unknown said...

Dear All of you,

I can say that he is gentleman. because he admitted for he had used no good words in his comment.
Wrong mean not correct and Right is true.
I also apologised to all readers for using vulgar words in my comment.
Releated to above topic -
Court will carefully consider on their last family agreement before Daw Khin Kyi departed, which what I hard from High Court staff, who is someone said to me.
Mrss. Mike,
You want this information right ?
I do not continute my comment anymore on this subject. because if I carry on to write too many,some mistake meaning will appear on my writing comment.

Thank you to all of you for educate me.

RASU88

naughty girl said...

First of all U aung san OO can not win unless the government is at his side to defeat Aunty SU.

U Aung san OO can not win cause he is not he citizen of Myanmar. With the law he can not have it. If he want it why did he gave up the citizenship he should have think carefully before he decided. He marry the same nationality which mean his wife is Myanmar also. but they both surrender the MM citizen ship.

Aunty Su married to foreigner but she didn't gave up the citizenship. Her late husband is British and her children was born there. She have many chances than U AUNG SAN OO. That is the thing we should admire Aunty Su. Even though her country is poor and in world's greats we are like last but not least. She didn't gave up her passport.

If the dirty government didn't support U Aung San Oo. We dun have to worry. If they support him we also dun have to worry also. Every one in our Country will welcome aunty SU with warm heart. It not like the Shwe family. If they lost their position and they dun have anyplace to live every one will close their doors and let them starve to death.

Oak said...

ေဒၚစုက ဒီေလာက္ၿမန္မာ့သမိုင္းမွာ အေ၇းပါအ၇ာေ၇ာက္ခဲ့တဲ့ မိသားစု၊ ၿပီးေတာ့သူတိုပိုင္တဲ့ အ၇ာအားလံုး ဘယ္ေတာ့မွ ေ၇ာင္းစားမွာမဟုတ္။ ၿမန္မာၿပည္သူေတြ အၿမတ္တႏိုးထား ထိန္းသိမ္းဘို႔ ၿမန္မာၿပည္သူေတြကိုဘဲ ေပးသြာမယ္ဆိုတာ ဇက္ၿဖတ္ခံၿပီးေၿပာ၇ဲတယ္။ ဒါေၾကာင့္ ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးမိန္းမ မိန္မပ်က္ ၿပင္သစ္အဖိုးၾကီးမယား ေၿပာသမွ်ကိုလုပ္မေပးတာဘဲ။ ေ၇ာင္းလိုက္၇င္ ၿပည္သူေတြအတြက္ သမိုင္အေမြမရိွမွာ ေဒၚစုကပညာတတ္ပီပီ ေတြးထားၿပီးသာပါ။ ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္အက်င္ပ်က္ၾကီးေတြ၇ဲ႕ ေနာက္မီးဆြဲေတြကေတာ့ သူတို႔ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ၾကီးေတြ အက်င္အၾကံမ်ိဳး ေဒၚစုၾကံမယ္ထင္ေနသူေတြ မင္းတိုအဲ့ဒီလိုထင္၇င္ မွားမယ္။ ဒီအိမ္ၾကီးဟာ လက္ရိွမွာေတာင္ အၿပည္ၿပည္ဆိုင္၇ာေခါင္ေဆာင္ေတြ လာေ၇ာက္ေတြဆံုခဲ့ ေ၇ာက္ခဲ့ဖူးတာေၾကာင့္ ေနာင္ၿမန္မာသမိုင္းမွာ တန္ဖိုးမၿဖတ္နိုင္တဲ့ ၿမန္မာၿပည္သူေတြ၇ဲ႕ သမိုင္းအေမြပါ။ဒါေၾကာင့္ ေဒၚစုက ဒီအိမ္ကို ေ၇ာင္းၿပီးသူအတြက္ဘယ္ေတာ့မွ လုပ္မွာမဟုတ္ ၿပည္သူေတြကိုသာ ေပးပါလိမ့္မယ္။ ေစါင့္ၾကည့္လိုက္ပါ။

HAN LAI said...

ဘာျဖစ္လို႔အျငင္းပြားျဖစ္ေနရတာလဲမသိ။ ေဒၚဆုမွာ အဲဒီအိမ္ထက္တန္တဲ့ အဖိုးတန္ပစည္းေတြအမ်ားႀကီးရွိတယ္ ပိုင္ဆိုင္တယ္ဆိုတာ ေအာင္ဆန္းဦး မသိဘူးလားမသိ။ ျကည့္ရတာ mike က ေအာင္ဆန္းဦးရဲ့ မယားပါသားမ်ားလားမသိ သနားစရာေလး mike နင္ကျမန္မာဆိုရင္ ျမန္မာလိုေရးေလ။ နင္ကျမန္မာ မဟုတ္ဘူးဆိုရင္လည္း ျငိမ္ၿငိမ္ေလးေနေပါ့

Pearl said...

Actually it should not be. There are so many reasons not to accuse Mommy Sue because she is his sister and is going help us, Myanmar people and she is a helpful lady. On the other hand, U Aung San Oo is not deteriorate. So he really does not need to accuse Mammy Su of the house. Anyway, Mammy Su does not mind. Whatever she could face because of being a heroine.

khristimatic said...

မွန္လိုက္ေလ Oak ၇ယ္ ငါလဲဇက္ၿဖတ္ခံၿပီးေလာင္း၇ဲတယ္

Powered by Blogger.